CleanTechnica

Read 31 Reviews of CleanTechnica to check if it is legit.

Website & Phone:
+44-75-98111792
 http://cleantechnica.com

Sergio
3 months ago

I've been banned multiple times for disagreeing with their defense of the corruption of the Democratic party. They will ban anyone who doesn't agree with their only Trump and the Republicans are bad but the Democrats are not also corrupt propaganda and lies. Both parties are corrupt, but if you dare point this out, they will call you a moron and ban you. CT is pure Democratic party corporate establishment propaganda and lies. It is an extremely corrupt site that is owned by corporations. It has some good articles on EV's, wind, and solar power, but it has a very biased pro corporate Democratic party political bias and will immediately ban anyone who points out the truth.

,

Lizette
5 months ago

They have a bias towards Tesla, but besides that, they have no clue about lithium pollution, lithium hazard, battery hazard!

If there's a religion around musk messiah it's surely fake news "clean" technica, literally like assiting to a new Church, from the "muskite" preachers who describe themselves as "belivers of musk" to comments that imitate this, saying "what ever musk does is good for us amen"

How can this crap site exist?

,

Denise
1 year ago

The lack of critical thinking in this source's reporting is a perfect example the technocratic zeitgeist of Tesla fanboys everywhere. CleanTechnica's worldview is that anyone who has the audacity to disagree with them is a pawn for big oil, and the comments here indicate as much. It's idiocy. It's misleading. It's dangerous.

This source publishes misleading articles. See below for a small example of how brainwashed this purveyor of questionable information is.

Cleantechnica headline: Fossil Vehicle Sales In Global Freefall Down 4.7% In 2019! Electric Vehicle Sales Continue To Grow CleanTechnica Report (https://cleantechnica.com/2020/01/18/fossil-vehicle-sales-in-global-freefall-down-4-7-in-2019-electric-vehicle-sales-continue-to-grow/) (Jan. 18, 2020)

Bloomberg headline: World's Largest Car Market Reports Second Straight Annual Decline
(https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-09/china-december-car-sales-fall-3-6-capping-second-annual-drop) (Jan. 9, 2020) ("Yet electric-vehicle demand has also sputtered since the government scaled back subsidies last year, leaving consumers assessing whether the higher prices for EVs are worth it. Wholesales of new-energy vehicles, including electric cars, fell 15% last month to 137,000 units, PCA said.")

electrive.com headline: CAM study finds USA and China EV markets in decline (https://www.electrive.com/2020/01/14/cam-study-finds-usa-and-china-ev-markets-in-decline/) (Jan. 14, 2020)

,

Perry
1 year ago

CT isn't reliable. Journalists most of time are just advertisers paid by big corporations into green business. I approached to CT with pleasure, but after reading fake news, manipulated datas and long, continuous, useless propaganda against Trump, Republican Party and all good sense critics that normal people do, after being labeled denier, troll, russian, moron because i expressed some critics toward blind-faith solutions, well.. i opened my eyes and stopped to even check at CT as a source of reliable information. Bias are towards anybody not adherent to mainstream green behaviour. Only brainwashed people can agree with CT at this point.

,

Anna
1 year ago

Best place to get info on all things sustainability. Don't believe the negative reviews, read the articles yourself. There are many evil people supporting big oil and giving false negative spin on important topics.

,

Earl
1 year ago

Several times an hour a clean techna article takes over my phone. How do I unsubscribe? I have no idea how I ever subscribed in the first place.

,

Elliot
1 year ago

I encourage people to look at their "articles" for yourself. Its laughable. There are a couple other sites that do the same thing and they all quote each other as their fabricated information confirmation to the reader. They even go as far as writing entire "articles" on a single reddit sub comment. This looks very desperate.

,

Gabrielle
1 year ago

Most articles are extremely poorly written and lack any research. They simply provide commentary on other articles. I have personally met one of their "journalist" at an event and I was surprised at that person's complete lack of understanding of business, technology, or energy. They simply followed anything Elon Musk said.

,

Caitlyn
1 year ago

If you go here, you'll read some awful, biased and poorly written article about why Tesla stock is going down. They will blame evil 'short sellers' and make every excuse in the book for why the company isn't performing.

If you try to inject any reason into the comments, you will be promptly banned by the stooge who runs the site. Don't waste your time, this is the zenith safe space for Tesla fanboys and that's about it.

,

Maricela
1 year ago

This site reads like a Tesla commercial. Don't waste your time trying to find any real and unbiased info.

,

Julio
1 year ago

The site treats new renewables in the same way that a religious sect treats the supreme Leader. Don't even try to challenge some of the opinions with facts. Your posts will be deleted and you will end up being treated as some type of troll sponsored by big nuclear or coal. It's all a marketing scheme made to support solar and wind power even if science is sometimes contrary to their claims.

,

Shirley
1 year ago

I have been a reader of this site for more than a year. Unfortunately in recent months it has become cheaply disguised Tesla propaganda news outlet.
Almost all of the writers and editors on the site are heavily invested in Tesla stock and systematically push the agenda that only Tesla is making good electric cars. Coverage of other interesting electric cars and carmakers is sporadic and often denigrating.

,

Nicolas
1 year ago

First, credit where it's due: CleanTechnica is, without doubt, one of the best sources of information for anyone interested in sustainable energy and transport and other green issues. There's a never-ending stream of interesting, well-written and generally well-researched articles.

Yet despite all this good stuff, as a reading experience CleanTechnica is hard to stomach. For example, a fair proportion of the articles are peppered with clumsy insults directed against the Republican Party and the Trump administration. Now, granted, it's hard to support a green agenda and not feel highly critical of these bodies. But when a writer interleaves serious information and juvenile comments, their work loses credibility. Similarly, head honcho Zach – such a knowledgeable guy – is perpetually bewildered that there are people too stupid to choose a Tesla. And says so, repeatedly.

Then there's the comments section. Full of knowledgeable posters, it's patrolled by a pack of angry man-babies on permanent red alert, ready to attack anyone who expresses even a moderately contrary opinion. These are inevitably labelled as trolls or FUDsters. The management pitches in by deleting any post that challenges The Message.

In summary, it's one of the best sites out there, but in serious need of some emotional intelligence.

,

Kira
1 year ago

I became aware of CleanTechnica while researching hydrogen energy topics in 2019. Negative articles on Hydrogen power turn out to be one of their specialties. The reporting is laced with flatly false statements layered on repetitive, theatrical, and predictably negative comments on the topic. It is one of the most biased news sources I have ever encountered. The editors here, clearly don't care. The writers often have questionable, non-technical backgrounds, but the topics covered are technical.

,

Stacey
1 year ago

As others have pointed out here (even though they dont match the number of the CT bots here, leaving their 5 stars reviews…), CT is a corporate backed website "reporting" in a very biased, one-sided way. As a reader one does not notice that straight away and they will have doubtlessly mislead a lot of people, but if you keep following them a little and look into them a little further, you will see the whole picture.

,

Julian
1 year ago

It is a great site. Has links to all good solid information. The focus on solar, wind and electric mobility. Lots of data about car sales, levlized cost of electricity etc.

,

Dale
2 years ago

This is one of the most absurd, corrupt one sided politically motivated sites I have had the opportunity to read and comment on.

They take money from big corps in order to push their agenda under the guise of journalism.

The site admins will ban you if you disagree with their statements on Tesla, facts non grata here. In the world, adults can have differing opinions without crying and banning critical thinking. It's anti-intellectualism at it's worst, albeit seeming to come from the left instead of the right.

I would advise people avoid this site if you are looking for any decent reporting. Terrible corporate stooges, liars, and a site scared to death of actual facts, as others have pointed out.

And I say this as someone who owns an electric car.

,

Cassie
2 years ago

It's all about the writers – they do care and it shows in all articles. Good mix of in-depth analysis with commentary and personal input.

,

Drew
2 years ago

Having been a reader of CleanTechnica for many years, what keeps me coming back is the constant flow of trustworthy information about clean tech products that I can buy or implement today. Change happens one step at a time and I am committed to being a part of that change through the products and solutions shared at CleanTechnica.

,

Clifford
2 years ago

For more than a decade now, CleanTechnica has been the go-to leader of all things clean tech. The site is highly respected and has more readers than any other clean tech news site out there. Millions upon millions of satisfied readers are stoked on the site and the global progress it promotes.

CleanTechnica is known for clear-minded analysis. You'll find positive reviews of clean tech, and you'll also find reviews that cast doubt on clean technologies that are unproven. The editors of CleanTechnica are industry veterans that only want to see the right technologies used to solve the appropriate global challenges….it's technology agnostic. So you know you're getting the straight truth.

,

Tabatha
2 years ago

Cleantechnica publishes many news articles about clean energy and always has useful information about solar power, wind power, EVs and energy storage.

Some trolls and haters of clean energy try to attack it and then get upset if they are corrected. It's almost funny how ill-informed they are.

,

Jacob
2 years ago

I find some of the negative reviews here are appalingly biased and entirely devoid of any truth. I should know, because I have been reading it every day for a number of years. Articles that i have read are mostly very stimulating and well researched. Each article seems to be the original, and well researched work of the author, arising from their personal interest, knowledge, and experience. A very small number of items are provided by guest contributers who are promoting their own product, but these are in a tiny minority. I myself have submitted some articles which have been published, and i am a retired public servant with no connections to any corporations.

I suppose it is the hazard of being the #1 site that it will attract more than its fair share of trolls, though authors and other contributers are fairly patient with them. I have never seen any comments removed, so if anyone has been banned altogether they must be entirely appaling.

,

Shana
2 years ago

I am a person who read 10 or what sometimes seemed like 25 books on every choice I made with my children's physical health when I was young. I eventually did research papers academically on those very subjects to prove to myself my choice stood the test of time. Although, I support that self-educating people have the most to offer– what Cleantechnia offers is both. Mostly, I am a recovered academic. I want facts that stand the test of time — not the latest fad. I feel I had to cut through 'fake' news in the 1970s, and raised by a Dr. who told me not to follow Madison Avenue that controlled media — I came by this way of choice honestly. I feel I find the Voice in many of the posts at Cleantechnica satisfies my critical Creative Writing standards. I can't read many things these days that don't. But more importantly, I find the research presented on Cleantechnica satisfies both my demand for the authentic research side in terms of credible research — but More. I find many of the writers prove themselves to be self-educating critical thinkers that use that research with discernment.

,

Brittney
2 years ago

The articles I write for CleanTechnica are 100% independent. Nobody tells me what to write. Editors only edit details. All articles are truly personal and independently researched. Anyone who reads articles on CleanTechnica on a regular basis can tell that the stories are diverse in regard to the authors interests and depth of research. Some like the hard core number crunching themes. Others like personal tales of experiences with cleantech in general. These are real people writing stories from their heart. Cleantechnica is as diverse and authentic as it gets. Period.

,

Alfred
3 years ago

Pretty simple. I started reading CT, but noticed a complete lack of critical thinking, lack of numbers, analysis, and irrational exuberance toward green companies. So I googled for CT reviews, which led me here, and found others who agreed, including mentioning the trolls in the comment section defending the advertarticles. Now CT has expanded their propaganda machine to this site, the CT editorial board reviewing themselves favorably and claiming their advertarticles really aren't. LOL.

Sorry CT, I don't mute the news program and unmute for the commercials, further, your site is dangerous to the real green community, it results in disasters like A123 systems (batteries) and Solyndra (solar panels), which negatively affect the ability of good green tech to get subsidies. Rush Limbaugh wants to sell me useless survival gear, CT wants to sell me useless subsidized green gear. Which will be worse for our future?

Is CleanTechnica legit or scam? Can I trust CleanTechnica?

Our user(s) provided the above reviews and comments against CleanTechnica, and they have been published as-is. We do not edit, change, or remove user-generated content. There is no amount of money that a company can pay to have their reviews or complaints manipulated, and we will not erase the CleanTechnica reviews at any cost.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *