Conservapedia

Read 344 Reviews of Conservapedia to check if it is legit.

Website & Phone:
 http://conservapedia.com

Stuart
2 months ago

Publishes information the media does not report.

,

Jamel
3 months ago

if the diabolic wall street oligarchs owned big techs like wot says is bad, enough said, it is the prove that is not just another piece of social marxist anti-christian hatemonger propaganda parroting the same crap from the giant globalist conglomerate of medias owned by the davos mafia. so i saw the bad rating I got immediatly interested, and after reading, one more case spot on something really free, authentic, and precious. as George Orwell said in times of diabolic tyranny the truth is outlawed and persecuted by the powers that be, screw them, long live the freedom.

,

Lindsay
3 months ago

Information manipulation without foundation. For intellect I give it 0. It only serves to laugh at the stupid things they write. Don't take what they post seriously. Better visit Wikipedia if you want to inform yourself properly.

,

Sofia
4 months ago

Straight talk as in before propaganda experts began manipulating the facts to support lies and to remove others from expressing alternate opinions from what the controlled media pushes.

,

Nancy
4 months ago

Lots of propaganda. This goes against the whole idea of Wikipedia. This is also homophobist.

,

Emanuel
6 months ago

This is a conservative-learning reference site. Since it is conservatives, leftists have bombarded it with their "tolerance."

,

Walter
7 months ago

Heavily biased articles, pushes a narrative that there's a conspiracy against conservatives.

,

Sonja
8 months ago

The Nazis are left-wing.
Homosexuality is "curable".
Questioning Jesus' existence is on par with Holocaust denial.
Pizzagate and 'Deep State' are real.

Just on top off my head. If you are looking for your daily portion of Anti-Intellectualism, or a good laugh, you found your place!

,

Wendell
9 months ago

This site is a deliberate source of political disinformation and false information, being the result of attempting to be "conservative" at the expense of unbiased information.
This is in no way a source of legitimate information.

See: www.mediabiasfactcheck.com/conservapedia/

Untrustworthy.

,

Tera
10 months ago

very informative and factual

,

Norman
11 months ago

great kool aid for drinkers for the sheeple of the right inclined, Look at the mug of the founder and you tell me you'd trust him with your daughter…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Schlafly

,

Lewis
11 months ago

Great site; nothing bad about it!
Negative reviews are posted by leftist radicals .

,

Cesar
1 year ago

This site is very trsutworthy. Left liberals cant handle the truth. Therefore, they flagged this site

,

Candice
1 year ago

Biased? Perhaps. Hate, discrimination, misleading and unethical? No more than then the major media, in fact considerably less so.

,

Benjamin
1 year ago

This site has true information, with good sources, easy to prove, as well as instructive part of the history and subjects of relevant importance.
Decent site that has no fake and misleading articles.

,

Destiny
1 year ago

Este site tem informa莽玫es verdadeira, com boas fontes, f谩cil de comprova莽茫o, al茅m de instrutiva de parte da historia e assuntos de relevante import芒ncia.
Site decente, que n茫o tem artigos falsos e enganosos.

,

Alexandra
1 year ago

The negative reviews of Conservapedia are posted by leftist radicals who abhor opinions contrary to their own. Disregard.

,

Thomas
1 year ago

just straight up racist lmao

,

Chasity
1 year ago

An easy way to prove to yourself that the side is very misleading, unethical and simply wrong on many points is to look at the reviews of the people defending the website.

,

Roman
1 year ago

This is heavily editorial content, and the articles are more commentary essays from a few ultra conservative voices than crowdsourced wiki content.

,

Trina
1 year ago

conservapedia, contrary to popular belief is for conservatives hence WHY the hate mongers are so vocally disingenuous about it!

the party of tolerance ISN'T leftists that's for certain. Conservatives have always been mellow about letting people have differing opinions. whereas the left has become Ideological and Divisive, and dare I say intolerant?

,

Jack
1 year ago

Great site! Love it!

,

Casey
1 year ago

Finally a Wikipedia alternative that respects my privacy! This website doesn鈥檛 steal my personal data & is NOT bias against Conservatives or Republicans

,

Edgar
1 year ago

it's a great site. i suspect all the negative reviews are made by far left busybodies who are just trying to discredit this site. shame on their disgusting lies!

,

Mary
1 year ago

Yes, it is a safe website, and its not "unethical or misleadin", the words to describe this should be "biased", but i wouldn麓t give it a low score based on just that.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *