Encyclop忙dia Dramatica

Read 14 Reviews of Encyclop忙dia Dramatica to check if it is legit.

Website & Phone:
 http://encyclopediadramatica.rs

Charles
8 months ago

This website is made as a pure joke, but now there's a problem that their maturity is becoming small. The users are very aggressive when it comes to lolcows.

,

Everett
10 months ago

Please, just throw it in the garbage and let it burn. Already happened? One cancer cured.

,

Patricia
1 year ago

I just want to make it known that people will often use this wiki as a weapon. If they don't like you, they'll threaten to make a page about you here and when somebody does, reporting it to the administrators is pointless because they will do absolutely nothing. Harassment is a very common result of having an article written against you, but in response, the admins and their userbase will just tell you that "ED is not your personal army" even though that is exactly what it's become over the years.
I personally don't get how mocking dead people or writing articles encouraging harassment towards minors is "satirical". That's not funny at all and, in fact, can lead to suicide as was the case with two known individuals who were bullied to death because of their harassment, the site being sued for one of those cases. They are also partially responsible for the whole "Chris-Chan" fiasco that happened at around 2006 to 2012 which lead to this very infamous individual becoming even worse.
While they are often supported for calling out pedophiles, about half of the users they call out as "pedophiles" are actually innocent of said accusation. However, that was enough to lead to one individual being harassed and meme'd for it.
To be quite honest here, they're not a reliable source of information at all. They are "Wikipedia's evil twin" after all (even Wikipedia tells you that their own site isn't exactly reliable). It should probably be taken with drastically less than a grain of salt.

,

Kareem
1 year ago

When you have already thought that Wikipedia is strongly biased, which Wikipedia definitely is, then you haven鈥檛 been on Encyclopedia Dramatica before. Apparently, at first it appears to be a website containing a lot of politically incorrect humor, mixed with very often bizarre pictures, which are truly fake. Well, I have no problem with a website like this, yet there is a difference between good politically incorrect or sometimes even violent humor (say South Park) and total stupidity that is not shocking, but just ridiculous and which gets worn out very quickly. And that is what this self-called encyclopedia is all about.

It should be obvious that nobody should use this website to find any kind of truthful information. Browsing around it a bit for testing, I would like to give you two examples of how false the information鈥檚 are, even while I know that this website truly does not exist for giving any kind of wisdom. Yet, the (obviously anonymous) guys who created it still call it an encyclopedia, so here you go:

1. Columbine. The infamous High School massacre from 20th April 1999. Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold are portrayed and openly called as heroes, while all of their victims are being ranted about for, well, being the victims, including many anti-Christian or racist insults. Obviously, they do not give you any facts. For example, while they rant about that the victim Cassie Bernall never has been asked by Eric Harris if she believes in God or not, while she answered the question with 鈥淵es鈥?and then has been shot, the truth is that there are actually two versions of how Cassie died at Columbine. When Eric saw Cassie, she was praying, keeping her hands clapped together and being in a praying position, so he felt offended by this. Even the police evidence proofs without a doubt, especially because of the position of how they have found her dead body, that Cassie has been shot and killed, while she was praying. A tip of one of her fingers has even been blown away, as she tried to shove the shotgun away from her head. So, even if you would not believe the story about Cassie saying yes in a short conversation with Eric, the other version is that she has been killed while praying to God, because Eric was offended that there was this girl praying to God, due to the fact that Eric hated all kinds of believers and was himself a strong believer into national socialistic theories, which his diary has proven without any doubt.

Funny, they even rely on the official police report about Columbine, although that one is not without wrong facts. For example, the police report states that Cassie has been shot and then Eric turned to Bree Pasquale, who was hiding behind Eric, and mocking her with words. Yet, when Bree was getting out of the school, she testified in front of a television camera, that Eric mocked her first and then he turned around and shot Cassie. Of course, this fact is being kept out by this 鈥渆ncyclopedia鈥? but the fact, no matter what one wants to believe, is that Cassie truly died as a martyr at Columbine. (I had studied about Columbine in general and also about Cassie鈥檚 last seconds for many years in private and even created a small website about it, so this is not a blank Christian defense for Cassie). Of course, the guys of Encyclopedia Dramatica keep all of these facts out, as they just gather weird stuff and include some mocking and ranting slurs, instead of doing a research about anything, before they publish it. And of course, they also keep out any kind of information about the other victims, but insulting them all. For example, they call the victim Corey DePooter a redneck with no reason and they are also mocking about the Christian girl Rachel Scott, just because of her Christian faith. And when it comes to Isaiah Shoels, who was black, well, you can imagine what he is being called like, by this self-called encyclopedia.

2. Alyssa Bustamante. The teenage murderer who killed 9-years-old Elizabeth Olten, in St. Martins, Missouri, on 21st October 2009. Having been interested into this case too, I have also made some research, especially about the anti-depressant known as 鈥淧rozac鈥? which Alyssa had to take, due to her doctors prescription, after she survived a suicide attempt in 2007. Already back in 25th May 1984, studies in Bad Homburg, Germany have proven that Prozac is extremely devastating to adults, not to mention to teenagers. Patients that took Prozac for testing have shown to become extremely suicidal, while they were fine before they took it. Alyssa was already suicidal, so, one can guess that Prozac can turn suicidal thoughts into homicidal thoughts, which, in the bloody end, ended up in her murdering Elizabeth. Of course, Encyclopedia Dramatica is only ranting about Alyssa, keeping this kind of information out, just as they keep many other information鈥檚 about Alyssa out as well, which are yet vital, to understand her story and her murderous actions, which, obviously, look inexplainable and just shocking on first sight. Yet, in the deeper look, one can see the many mistakes that society obviously allowed to happen, like the fact that, despite the warnings from the studies, Prozac has been given to doctors for treating patients, because the company who created Prozac made some payments under the table. And to show again their incompetence and false information, they claim that the mugshot of Alyssa, which they have uploaded, has been taken in 2015. Yet, the truth is, that it has been done already on 18th November 2009 and therefore six years earlier, than what this self-called "encyclopedia" claims. I also find it interesting, that while Alyssa is only being ranted about on this so-called encyclopedia, for having murdered a young girl, at the same time the mass murderers Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold are called heroes on this website. Sounds schizophrenic and yes, I believe it absolutely is.

And to top it all off, besides the extreme amount of pornographic pictures, very often the Jews are being called to be the number 1 reason for just every problem in this world, while very often Nazi symbolism is thrown at you at a dozen, including the Svastika and KKK-symbol. Symbols are just symbols, yet, if you use them while you rant against Christians, mock the Jews for everything, call every black person that you write about with the infamous N-word, and believe yourself to be absolutely perfect, while the rest of the world seems to be just a bunch of losers that should bow down to your own extremist opinion, there is no doubt that Encyclopedia Dramatica is just awful. Even if you try to just see it as a website that includes a lot of very black and politically incorrect humor, which I personally would have nothing against, it is easy to see that this website has been likely created by some right-wing extremists, who believe themselves to be absolutely superior, as long as they sit safely in front of a computer screen and not walking alone outside on the streets, of course.

While you can consider Wikipedia to be in the very far left, you can easily consider Encyclopedia Dramatica to be in the very far right. It is not about true black humor and political incorrectness, it is all about mocking non-whites, all kinds of God-based religions and their followers and using plenty of pornographic pictures (mostly cheap amateur stuff) to gain any kind of attention. Yet, it is being thrown in such an amount at you, that even if you like something like this, there is still a huge chance left, that you just get tired of all this and just go to any other webpage on the net and leave this self-called encyclopedia in the gutter. I personally wouldn鈥檛 be surprised, if many of its creators and users could be found browsing the Darknet as well. There are a billion or even more websites out in the internet, so, in my personal opinion, you can easily skip this bunch of absolute nonsense, that has nothing to do with either an encyclopedia or dramaturgy. Not even the black and political incorrect humor is worth to mention. It is one of the websites that truly nobody needs, except of course for the sad, lonely souls that have created it and are even a part of its community.

,

Samuel
1 year ago

I can confirm that this is a hostile website. Even the ads give you viruses. If you are stupid enough to go here, then please have the sense to shut off javascript so your computer will not be infected.

,

Frankie
1 year ago

Unlike what the other poster has said, Encyclopedia Dramatica takes a huge dump accross the board. There are no diversity hires in Encyclopedia Dramatica. Everyone gets shat on equally, no mather the gender, race, sexual orientation, or else ("white devils" is a article that $#*!s on white people, as opposed to the article titled "nigger") . Even the visitors of Encyclopedia Dramatica get a nice warm log down their throat.To top it off, they have a page for snowflakes, titled "offended". It starts off with normie memes, but quickly shows its true glorious form, as the gore pics take over. If you were to get offended by "offended", you will be redirected to a page that will open every program on your computer, as well as try to install malware.
I would suggest Encyclopedia Dramatica to replace the much less intelligently made Wikipedia, as the no1 online encyclopedia.

,

Alaina
1 year ago

Unlike what the other poster has said, Encyclopedia Dramatica takes a huge dump accross the board. There are no diversity hires in Encyclopedia Dramatica. Everyone gets shat on equally, no mather the gender, race, sexual orientation, or else ("white devils" is a article that $#*!s on white people, as opposed to the article titled "$#*!") . Even the visitors of Encyclopedia Dramatica get a nice warm log down their throat.To top it off, they have a page for snowflakes, titled "offended". It starts off with normie memes, but quickly shows its true glorious form, as the gore pics take over. If you were to get offended by "offended", you will be redirected to a page that will open every program on your computer, as well as try to install malware.
I would suggest Encyclopedia Dramatica to replace the much less intelligently made Wikipedia, as the no1 online encyclopedia.

,

Herbert
1 year ago

former site owner zaiger was thown out after getting caught trying to sabotage site, as well as for using malvertising to fund drug addictions.

this is a great improvement!

any claim that the site promotes hate speech is just bullshit from regressive leftists.

,

Corey
2 years ago

Very edgy parody website, completely politically incorrect with many racism, sexism and anything in-between. Nothing directly malicious but some links and sites can be shocking and some personal information are stored.

,

Rhonda
2 years ago

This website is full of stupids and bad jokes. They are trolls, cyber-bullies, and discrimination. They're making fun and harassing on women, ethnics, cultures, religions, politics, and mental disabilities such as autism. This website must be banned.

,

Jason
2 years ago

It's teh best site evar

,

Samantha
3 years ago

They dox people and list their home addresses. They laugh and encourage violence to those who show concern about it. Site should be taken down, but they keep moving their servers around overseas.

,

Isabel
3 years ago

The site itself does not promote doxing or other harmful activities, as it is just an archival wiki with a comedic, cynical twist.
It's a good place to explain the sketchy antics of many types of people, sometimes even just objects, websites, or groups of people.

A fun place to research (online drama) topics if you aren't a coward. It is more creative than Leafyishere and is obviously satire, while people took Leafy seriously. Then again, Bluecatriolu and the person below take this site seriously, so there's that, but still: anybody who actually thinks about it knows this site is just satire with the main purpose of archiving information with a funny dramatic twist.

Some of the articles are not well researched, however.
Their article on Nirvana and Kurt Cobain for example.
Considering the fact that Nirvana was huge, and appealed to the Encyclopedia Dramatica outcast crowd, they should know WAY more than they do.

,

Kelley
3 years ago

Experience is stupid popups and near porn with regards to a woman activist. I may come back and rate down if I find anything else.

Is Encyclop忙dia Dramatica legit or scam? Can I trust Encyclop忙dia Dramatica?

Our user(s) provided the above reviews and comments against Encyclop忙dia Dramatica, and they have been published as-is. We do not edit, change, or remove user-generated content. There is no amount of money that a company can pay to have their reviews or complaints manipulated, and we will not erase the Encyclop忙dia Dramatica reviews at any cost.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *